BACK TO THE FUTURE – PART FOUR

by Holly Horning

“No man is truly great who is great only in his lifetime. The test of greatness is the page of history.”

– William Hazlitt

Today, let’s conclude the discussion that helps explain the Tigers’ rebuild and sheds more light about what may be expected down the road.

We want to know exactly how all of this is going to play out.  We want to know about the team’s priorities, timeline and when that championship roster will finally be completed.

We want to know when the Tigers will be contending again.

We wonder why it took so long to finally hire a competent manager who could effectively harness the talent he was given.  And why it has taken so long to start saying “buh-bye” to members of the decades-old clique.

In Parts One and Two, we started to get some logical explanations.  I wrote about the need to go back in time and analyze the ownership under both Mike Ilitch and his son, Chris. 

In Part Three, we looked at Dave Dombrowski’s legacy and the early years of Al Avila’s reign as his successor.

If you didn’t read them – or need to review the issues – here they are again because it’s important to know both owners and their GMs in order to help us understand why the present and future are playing out in the manner that they are.

By reviewing the history, we come to the real purpose of this blog.  The need to understand is because history is constantly open to evolution and interpretation.  For many actions, it takes time for everything to play out and come to fruition. 

Because history often gets misinterpreted early in the making.  Sometimes we need to experience time, distance and the results before returning to those earlier days in order to make sense of the present.

Time has the ability to allow us to see things more clearly.  To eliminate the assumptions we made early in the process.  To be able to stand back and view actions in a more detached manner.

To be able to also detach from our emotions which may have clouded the entire process.

With the Tigers, we need to take a step back and reassess what has happened with this team.

We need to get rid of the assumptions we’ve been making all these years.  Those stubborn beliefs that just may be holding us back in our honest assessments.

We need to erase the board and start over.  And if we come to the same conclusions, then so be it.

But it’s important that we don’t remain stubborn in our beliefs and embrace the possibility that we were wrong in our initial assessments.

If we see things differently, and consider more possibilities, we may just come to believe that there were different motivational factors at play.  Or at least, different strategies.

Most important? Correcting certain beliefs will also change how we evaluate others who came later.

In the end, isn’t it worthwhile to see and understand the different factors that may have had important roles in determining the Tigers’ path?

I think so.

Considering the Tigers, we may just make sense of moves made in the past that didn’t seem logical back then – but now do.

It’s now time to move past the previous discussions of possible motivations of both Ilitchs and the actions of the past and current GMs.  It’s time to turn our attention to the actual tearing down years.  The messy years.

What do we know?

First of all, every move dating back to 2017 is due to the team Chris Ilitch inherited from his father.   (To be factually correct, he doesn’t own the team as it’s in a trust.  But he is the de facto owner.)

His father passed in early 2017 so one has to assume that Chris started taking over sometime in 2016.

And as I wrote in a previous blog in this series, and confirmed recently by several financial writers, he inherited a mess.  One of MLB’s highest payrolls with an ageing roster and expectations of an imminent and significant decline in performance.

No successful businessman is going to pour even more money into an organization that needed a complete overhaul.  And Chris undoubtedly was familiar with the crash-and-burn Phillies who were in similar circumstances and waited too long in an attempt to unload expensive contracts.  By the time Philadelphia decided they needed to cut payroll, they couldn’t.  There were no takers for their older, expensive players and their rebuild has lasted 8 years.

Ilitch had no choice but to tear down the organization starting in 2017 while he could still unload contracts.  That was his only option.  That is, unless you want to slowly kill the team and its fanbase by dragging it out for years.

Teardowns are always messy.  They are hard to endure.  They create bad feelings.  And they make fans very, very resentful, esp. when their favorite players are traded.

Understand that we can agree that certain destructive moves have to be made in order for teams to get better.  And that while we understand what needs to be done, we also don’t have to like it.

You can’t really fault Chris for what he did.  He was cleaning up after his father.

But if you’re going to blame him for anything, it’s who he put in charge of trading his players.

Al Avila.

But did he really have a choice?  As I wrote in Part Three, teams don’t fire their GMs in a tear down.  They serve an essential purpose by taking the heat meant for owners and doing all of the messy stuff that no one else wants to touch.

And you don’t hire a new GM and spend more money, just for them to trade away their players.  It’s not a wise move in any way.

Besides, who is going to willingly sign on to be a GM for a team whose sole purpose is to tear down a roster?  No one.  It’s a career killer.

You hire a new GM when your team is rebuilding and renewing.

Now, to Avila’s defense, it’s very hard to trade players and receive decent value in return when everyone else in baseball knows you are tearing down.  Knowing that you have to dump salary.  Teams recognizing that contracts have to be dumped and having the leverage to negotiate them down in order to get a great deal or two.

Yes, the trades were horrible.  And yes, Avila was also put in a tough position.

But he was also too loose-lipped.  He gave away too much information.  He couldn’t successfully sell the players needing to be traded.  At least not like his former boss who could have sold snow to Eskimos.

Also consider that back in 2017, the Tigers barely had an analytics department.  They were still using an antiquated system to determine real value and talent in trades.  Essentially, trying to find valuable players was a crapshoot.  The Tigers were, for the most part, flying blind. 

It would be another 2+ years before the Tigers would have a viable analytics department.

And that was not Avila’s fault.  The blame goes to Mr. I and Dave Dombrowski.  Avila was the one who finally brought the system in.

Now, consider this.  The first “official” year of the tear down was 2017.  The Tigers lost 98 games that year and had a payroll of $207 million.  It was the second highest in MLB.

Ouch.

But there were other expenses, too.  I’ve written that the Tigers had MLB’s highest operating expenses in all of MLB and almost double that of the next team.

That means that other cuts needed to be made.

Which is why they kept Brad Ausmus in 2017.  He would have been owed the money anyway.  And no team with 98 losses is going to go out and hire another manager and pay two of them. 

Also consider that when you make any new hire, it is increasingly harder and more expensive to get rid of them down the road.

Simply put, 2017 was a throw-away year.  Keep the failed manager and his ineffective coaches.  It saves you money in the end.  In a year that doesn’t matter at all because no matter how you cut it, your team is going to be excruciatingly horrible.

Moving to 2018, the Tigers were still in tear-down mode.  They needed to cut another $80 million to get them down to just below $130 million.  Even with that, they still sat around the MLB average payroll despite another year in which they would lose 98 games.

Anticipating that it would take awhile longer to tear things down, there was no need to hire top talent just yet.  You don’t buy expensive tires to put on a clunker and you don’t hire top talent to tear down a roster.  You hire them when you want to build a successful roster.

You don’t get rid of Dave Littlefield and David Chadd just yet.  You need inexpensive seat warmers.  Besides, hiring their replacements would cost money.

The Tigers had just started rebuilding their farms system with top draft picks but not enough yet to start making a difference.

All of the old clique and hangers-on were on life support.  They probably didn’t know it yet, but they had their expiration dates already stamped.

Now, let’s move to the dugout.

The Tigers hired a new manager in the name of Ron Gardenhire.  He was unemployed as were his former coaches from the Twins.   Long-term unemployed individuals are eminently less expensive.  Besides, Gardy was one of Jim Leyland’s best friends.  The Tigers probably got him on the cheap.

A current manager – or rising star – would never come to a team that was in tear down mode.  Again, it would be a career-killer.  The best candidates are those with no perceived future.  Guys who really just wanted to stick in the game or needed a paycheck.

In 2018, it would still be awhile before the Tigers emerged from the cellar.  The organization simply needed babysitters.  Babysitters who could smile through it all, crack jokes and put on a brave front.

Which is why long-term coaches like Lloyd McClendon and Dave Clark stayed.  It was guaranteed employment as a reward for loyalty to guys who were unlikely to be hired by other teams once they left.

Potentially, the Tigers maybe even saved money by bringing in Gardy and his crew.

So if we’re going to be truly justified in criticizing people within this organization, it is with the concerted effort to tank.

Tanking is the strategy more and more teams are using to rebuild more cheaply.  It is all about purposely being as bad as possible in order to cut as much salary and expenses as possible.  It’s about knowingly putting a non-competitive team on the field.  It is about being as bad as you can so you can get top draft picks and reap the financial rewards MLB gives out to baseball’s worst teams.

For example, when the Houston Astros went through their tanking, they were also MLB’s most profitable team.  They had multiple revenue streams and benefits/rewards coming into them.  And every other team took note.  With each year, more and more teams are adopting tanking strategies.

Tanking, btw, is the top issue for this year’s new CBA negotiations.

The Tigers practiced tanking for 4 years.  This is where fans should place their anger, if any.

It’s also why the Tigers kept all of these people through the tanking years.  It was easier and cheaper just to keep warm bodies through the tanking process and not make any changes.  It simply didn’t matter.

But at some point, estimated to be in 2018, Chris Ilitch started to invest in the team behind the scenes.  The Tigers had started to expand their analytics department and were buying the latest technology to be used in the field and in the Front Office.

Things would start to shift after the 2020 season.  With the premature departure of Ron Gardenhire and possible anticipation that top talent would become available shortly.

And that’s where we will pick up in Back to the Future – Part 5.  A blog that explores the first year of rebuilding and the changes that came with it.  A blog that will help explain the timeline and rationale for the moves the Tigers started to make.

Stay tuned….

(To keep us focused on our discussions, please keep your 3-4 sentence comments focused on the tear down process through the Gardenhire years.  You’ll have the chance to address the 2021 season and future going forward in the next blog.)


What did you miss on our Twitter feed yesterday? (And why aren’t you following TT yet?)

  • It’s JV Day – A comprehensive series on all the news about the teams, the contracts, the timeline and the rationale. And where the Tigers stand in all of this.
  • And finally? JV’s decision.

Get your Totally Tigers fix beyond this blog.  We publish breaking news, national stories of note, videos, observations and polls throughout the day.  Every day.

Click here: https://twitter.com/totallytigersbb or simply enter “totally tigers bb” (make sure you add the “bb”!) in the search box at twitter.com and click on “Follow.”


Totally Tigers loves your comments but please be aware of the rules for posting.  Comments may be edited and responses are only published if they address today’s topic, are respectful and do not exceed the maximum number of 3-4 sentences.  All rules may be found by clicking on the link at the top of the page.

25 thoughts on “BACK TO THE FUTURE – PART FOUR

  1. Don’t see your comment? Have you checked the rules for posting? Comments are only approved if they address today’s topic, do not exceed the maximum length and meet all of the other requirements posted in our rules section ( the “Rules” button located at the top of the page). This also means NO CAPS. Please make sure to check them out!

    Like

  2. Holly, speaking of Gardenhire, any thoughts on the very strange, abrupt, circumstances surrounding his departure before a season had even ended?

    Like

    • I agree. There was something about that press conference that didn’t ring true. Al Avila looked really uncomfortable and Gardy’s reaction was out of character. Maybe Gardy was promised something that Avila ultimately couldn’t deliver.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, Sean – You are correct. I did write about this when it happened. There was much more going on behind the scenes. All you had to do was watch the press conference and see both mens’ body language and how defensive they both were. Gardy didn’t even make eye contact, looking down at the ground.

      Who knew who started the conversation first but at some point, Gardy was told he wouldn’t be extended so he just decided to leave. The most peculiar part of the whole incident is that both he and Tigers spent almost a full month afterwards reiterating that he decided to leave early. When you’ve got so much effort and time defending the move, there’s always something behind the effort.

      I believe it had to do with A. J. Hinch. Things just happened too quickly afterwards. And I’m going to cover that in the next installment. Thanks for the question! – Holly

      Liked by 3 people

      • Remember when Trammel was let go and it was found out that the decision was made a month prior? Tram said that he should have been let go then. It’s a face saving thing or everyone knows I’m gone but me situation. So I have to give Gardy a bit of a pass. But I don’t know everything behind the scenes.

        Liked by 3 people

  3. The popular tanking strategy which the Tigers have copied is truly revolting. When the Lords of Baseball request or extort tax breaks and assistance from regional governments for building new stadia with luxury boxes, they do not explain that some seasons they plan to lose. If they offered deep discounts to watch their tanking teams flail around, it might more just. But that’s not part of the deal, is it?

    Liked by 4 people

    • And people can still bet on a losing team, Hughie. They just play the spread. So as long as a tanking team doesn’t hurt the house, MLB is happy. Disgusting!

      Liked by 4 people

      • That’s a great point and of course that is a reason they are not interested in shortening the timed played of these games. When managers trudge to the mound, batters step out of the box, and pitchers twiddle on the mound those gambling have more time to place their bets. Hey, maybe they can cram in more commercials on the screen during the game and run more full blown ads as well. How fun for the rest of us!

        Liked by 3 people

  4. Great analysis as always, Holly. But I’m still frustrated by the low priority given player evaluation and development during the tear-down years. That should have been job #1 to accelerate the rebuild. Instead, the “old-boys” network left our young guys to develop themselves – which explains why so few MLB players came up through the Tiger system.

    Liked by 7 people

    • I agree 100%. It’s not like Avila spent countless hours going over analytics reports to determine the best trades used to dump the salaries. He just took whatever he could get after he had already spilled the beans. Thus, if he was supposed to be such a good scout (also debatable), he could have been laying the groundwork to have the minors start developing the young draft picks.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Al has absorbed his deserved criticism, enhanced by his pentence for loose lips described by Holly, but has had more than a few FA with unfortunate injuries. Also, Al was honest from the onset of the tanking that this was going to be ugly. As to CI, his recent investments into infrastructure and analytics shows he did have a plan.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I don’t see that there was much evidence of a plan initially except to dump salary and expenses. Regardless of how tough things get, there’s always opportunities, however small or “behind the scenes” they are, to lay a foundation for a successful future. The subsequent investment in the team is evidence to me that the plan changed focus abruptly for some reason.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Could be Chris decided to keep the Team instead of selling. There does appear to be a plan – a slow and steady one. Not all bad, but no sense of urgency to calm the angst of the fans. And when you’re sitting on a profitable franchise you can afford to take your time.

        Liked by 2 people

      • I am sure you’re correct. When Chris Ilitch realized he could make money keeping the Tigers, then, and only then, did a strategic plan aimed at improving the Tigers become obvious. It was Al Avila’s job to get the best possible results from the terms dictated to him by the new owner. I see no evidence that he ever had such a plan and if he did it was either a poor plan or its execution was a complete flop or both.

        Liked by 1 person

  6. Your analysis Holly is indicative of relentless research and an interconnection with baseball reps that know the whole truth. While I’m not so prone to let Chris Ilitch off the hook for horrible, greedy decisions, I am understanding more clearly what was going on behind the scenes. Thank you for suberb sports journalism.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Holly’s the best. She must be great at her day job because what she writes for TT in her “spare” time is far better than what the professional journalist turn out. Maybe she missed her calling.

      Liked by 3 people

  7. If Chris immediately sold the team when Mr I passed and everything that has happened since then has happened for this new owner we fans wouldn’t be so hard on the team. But as it turns out Chris had the right guy in Avila and Avila had the right guy in Gardy. Sometimes you just get lucky.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Great analysis as usual. Holly. But the tale you tell is about a depressing, disgusting, and maybe dishonest era in MLB history. All that the fan can say is what the kid in Chicago supposedly said, “Say it ain’t so, Joe.” One of the overworked expressions that we should ditch is the one about “storied franchises.”

    Liked by 3 people

  9. This was a superb piece Holly,which gives me a clearer picture of what transpired. It still upsets me however that Ilitch had Al Avila be the engineer of the teardown and rebuild of the roster. He is a loose lipped,poor trader of talent and made boneheaded trades at the time. We shouldnt have had such a embarassing and unproductive 2017-2020.

    Liked by 5 people

  10. Thanks Holly, for breaking everything down and putting things into perspective for us. As fans who are passionate about our Tigers, we sometimes forget or are unaware of the workings behind the scenes. I think I can speak for all of my fellow readers when I say that we truly appreciate all the hard work you put into this blog.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. All this clarity and understanding is just making me more mad. Reveal all the truth and fact there is, I am for it and grateful for the efforts. It will however, never justify or exonerate the people behind the choices, behavior, and treatment of fans during that timeframe. It’s was then and is today more than just business.

    Liked by 5 people

  12. If the club were ever sold it will not happen until Marian I passes on. I was still frustrated because I couldn’t figure out what the plan was. Thanks to Holly I now think there was no plan at the beginning. The club was is poor financial shape so the trades made didn’t bother me that much. I am a firm believer that any financial house has to be in order before you make improvements. I also believe CI and the Tiger do not owe me a thing. If I don’t like their product I’m free to go elsewhere.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes they don’t owe us anything. People need to understand it is a business. Period. The idea is to make money and the game aspect is second. It always has been that way and us fans get disillusioned because we believe they should put the game and us first, but they can’t. They have to run the business properly. Just like I do with my budget, I keep it balanced and don’t get into debt/overspend. If I don’t like the product, I go elsewhere.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. Just my jaded opinion but AA and his never ending contract need to go. AJ (and perhaps Analytics Dept) seem to be calling the shots at this point in time). I still don’t trust AA in the GM position given his past track record. Just my evil 2 cents worth

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.