BACK TO THE FUTURE – PART TWO

by Holly Horning

“No man is truly great who is great only in his lifetime. The test of greatness is the page of history.”

– William Hazlitt

Today, let’s continue the discussion surrounding the latter stages of the Tigers’ rebuild.

We all have lots of questions about their priorities, when they may once again contend and when a championship roster may be completed.

We’ve been getting more clues this year with all the new hires.  But these recent additions have also generated more questions.

On Tuesday, I wrote about the need to go back in time and analyze the ownership under Mike Ilitch.  With the passing of time, perspectives change.  Allowing some time gives us the gift of detachment, thereby allowing us to better understand why certain moves and strategies were made.

If you didn’t read it then – or need to review the issues – here it is again because it’s important to understand Mr. I in order to help us appropriately frame the new leadership under Chris Ilitch.

Going back in time allows us to revisit assumptions and see things more clearly.  Most importantly, it allows us to make sense of the present.

Emotions are not as raw.  Emotions that can often cloud what we believe.

Today, we’re going to address Chris Ilitch’s actions and try to understand them better.  Is he the Satan or the saint of our beloved team? Or somewhere in-between?

Let’s review the factors that are in play.  And as we do so, let’s put the assumptions we’ve made to the side in an honest attempt to see things more clearly.

In effect, we need to erase the board and start over.  And if we come to the same conclusions, then so be it.

But if we see things differently, and consider more possibilities, we may just come to believe that there were other motivational factors at play.  Or at least, different strategies.

Maybe we even begin to understand why certain actions were taken and why some weren’t.  All will play into understanding this team better as they continue to change and adapt.

Now, let’s discuss the enigma known as Chris Ilitch.

First of all, it’s interesting to see how different father and son are.  Mike was extroverted and wore his heart on his sleeve.  You knew where he stood and he was always the center of attention at any press conference. 

Mr. I loved his players and bonded on a personal level with so many of them.  Relationships were very important to him.

On the other end is Chris.  Evidence of being introverted (at least in public) and always measured in his thoughts.  He rarely spoke other than at the few important yearly events.  It’s been reported that he avoids the public glare as much as possible.

He came from the Dave Dombrowski school of communication.  He made comments without really telling you anything.  Even his statements about spending on free agents this off-season can be interpreted multiple ways.

Chris is not an emotional man – at least in the business world.  He measures everything before acting or speaking.

And he’s a highly successful businessman despite the fans who mock him as the guy who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth.  He’s got a BA in business administration from Michigan and oversees a multi-billion dollar conglomerate.  If he couldn’t cut it, he wouldn’t be in the position he is. 

Since taking over from his father, he has increased the value of the Tigers by app. 32% according to some business journals.  His earnings (combined with other family members) has moved Ilitch Holdings into a tie for first place of MLB’s richest owners along with Steve Cohen of the Mets.

The man knows how to make money, pure and simple.  But the biggest myth out there is that the richest are supposed to spend the most.  In actuality, the richest spend as little as necessary.  That’s how they got to be so rich. 

The smartest business people make solid investments and don’t spend money without giving it very careful consideration.  They are the least likely to make big, splashy investments.  Or at least follow through on promises.  You can see this point in Chris’ failure to keep his promises about District Detroit. 

Yes, it is a red flag when you see a pattern to someone’s spending habits, but let’s wait a little bit longer before we make any judgments about his intentions re the Tigers.

Where Chris gets the bum rap is from fans’ expectations that he is now required, even obligated, to spend just like his father.

So does that mean the Tigers are doomed to never see October baseball again as long as CI runs it?

No.  At least we can’t say that yet.  We haven’t seen Chris go through his first real test of building a successful baseball product.  Since he took over, the team has been entrenched in the dismantling phase.

Let’s now turn to that topic. 

Chris did not inherit a pretty picture when he took over the Tigers.  His father had vastly overspent on trying to buy that World Series ring and once that window closed, the team was buried under a mountain of expensive contracts on ageing players that few now wanted.  His father has created an unsustainable system that would collapse sooner rather than later.

The Tigers lost millions under Mike’s ownership for his last 10 years as owner.  The Tigers had  MLB’s highest operating expenses, nearly double that of the next team.  For the record, it was reported that Chris cut them in half during his first year in charge.

But the monetary expenditure and results waiting for him in 2017 was very ugly.

The Tigers had 98 losses that year (.395 win/loss percentage) and ended the year 38 games out of first place.  The payroll?  Over $200 million.

In 2018, the team had the same record as 2017.  Over $135 million in salary alone.

For 2019, the Tigers almost set a record – and not a good one.  Losses were 114 (.292 win/loss record) and a whopping 53.5 games out of first.  Salary was $129 million.

Ridiculous, right?  If you were him, what would you have done?  Allowed the most expensive players to age and stay on the roster, significantly extending the years of misery?  Or ripping the bandage off as quickly as possible?

The dumping of fan favorites like JV, J. D. Martinez and others was very ugly.  But it had to be done.  You can’t find fault with this strategy even though no one liked it.

It was going to be ugly either way.  The only choice to be made was how long should the misery be allowed to continue.  This was simply an example of “live by the sword, die by the sword.”

However, if any anger is to be appropriately placed, it should be on the return the Tigers got from other teams.  And that blame lies with Al Avila. (We’ll discuss him in Part 3, so please save your comments about the GM until then.)

Chris is a businessman and he’s looking at the bottom line.  We saw a brief glimpse of his style when he briefly took over for his father one year and denied Dave Dombrowski’s request for more money in order to sign Joe Nathan.  Dave was forced to cut some salary and the day after he traded Doug Fister, Nathan was signed.

Looking at the Tigers now, Chris moved the team into the black a mere 2 years after he took over.

To put this in perspective, and to show the relevance, there are several other teams in the AL Central which are having financial issues.  The Royals, to an unknown degree.  But also the Indians who are having serious problems and now have MLB’s lowest payroll at $50 million in an attempt to right the ship.  They are also surrounded by the rumors of selling and possibly a relocation of the team.

And now we’re hearing the whispers that the Tigers are a likely landing spot for Carlos Correa simply because the Tigers became infamous for doing these insane contracts.  Potentially adding another contract that is expected to be around $340 million and 10 years.  Couple that with the fact that Correa played for A. J. Hinch.  Many journalists believe this will happen without even considering the guy who signs the checks.

But do you really believe that Chris Ilitch will do that?  Do you even want him to put the majority of money on a single player?

Do you believe that he wants to get back into the payroll escalation game after just getting out?  With Miguel Cabrera’s salary still on the books (and increasing) for the next 2 years?  With the Tigers still not close to contending?  You sign a player like Correa when you need that last piece in order to take you over the top.  Not when you still need to fill 3-5 other positions.

Chris did state in his last interview that that Tigers won’t be doing insane contracts and that his wish is to create a sustainable team.

Translation:  We’re not going to be tied down with lengthy expensive contracts that will weigh us down as that player becomes older and less productive.  We want to create a roster of top talent that will stay with us and when a player leaves, we have depth in the minors to replace him and allow this team to stay competitive year after year.

It’s important that we see Chris’ point of view.  It’s also important to understand the options he had.  We don’t have to like them but we need to understand them nonetheless.

He is very different than his father.  Mike was beloved but had a horrible instinct when it came to running the team.  Many find it hard to like Chris but could he potentially be the savior of the team?  Could he turn out to be the smart owner who raises the bar and puts a focus on evolving this organization into a smart one that stays updated and proactive?

That is still to be determined.  His first real test comes this year.  This off-season.

But it’s not going to happen overnight.  It’s not going to happen all in one year.  It’s going to take some time.

The Tigers are still in the process of dismantling as they formally evaluate all their talent and decide which players have a continued future with the team.  But now, for literally the first time in decades, they are digging beyond the roster.

Does this mean that Chris is the instigator of change?

You’ll just have to wait until this blog series concludes next week to find out.  We’ll dig into the new vision and identify the culprits responsible.

We’ll also explore Al Avila’s relationship to the team, the building of a new team and what the Gardenhire years were all about.

And the biggest question?  Why did the Tigers wait until this year to start making changes to their player development system.

Stay tuned…..


What did you miss on our Twitter feed yesterday? (And why aren’t you following TT yet?)

  • The Tigers have 4 players who are now free agents. Who are they?
  • There are now 6 former starting pitchers from the Detroit Tigers who have now earned their World Series rings with other teams.
  • Is TT’s timing perfect or what? The Tigers sign a new catcher via trade on the day we post a similar blog.
  • Tucker Barnhart’s signing shows that A. J. Hinch’s fingerprints were all over it.


Get your Totally Tigers fix beyond this blog.  We publish breaking news, national stories of note, videos, observations and polls throughout the day.  Every day.

Click here: https://twitter.com/totallytigersbb or simply enter “totally tigers bb” (make sure you add the “bb”!) in the search box at twitter.com and click on “Follow.”


Totally Tigers loves your comments but please be aware of the rules for posting.  Comments may be edited and responses are only published if they address today’s topic, are respectful and do not exceed the maximum number of 3-4 sentences.  All rules may be found by clicking on the link at the top of the page.

33 thoughts on “BACK TO THE FUTURE – PART TWO

  1. Don’t see your comment? Have you checked the rules for posting? Comments are only approved if they address today’s topic, do not exceed the maximum length and meet all of the other requirements posted in our rules section ( the “Rules” button located at the top of the page). This also means NO CAPS. Please make sure to check them out!

    Like

  2. Holly, your analysis of Chris makes me more optimistic. Although it was rumored he once planned to sell the team, he now seems challenged to turn the franchise around competitively as well as financially. And his analytical style supports the personnel and organizational moves that began with the hiring of Hinch. Looking forward to Part Three to discover if Al Avila has been anything but an expedient GM (cheap, loyal, and already there).

    Liked by 5 people

  3. Yes, Chris Illitch hired cheap management, did not invest in the club for years, and fielded AAA players and cast offs. I guess this shows his business shrewdness. Strangely this kind of franchise shrewdness is not something I “root” for, and I am not ready to make him the hero of this own-going saga. Nor after enjoying the last several years of Illitch the elder’s divisional dominance with DD at the helm, am I set to cast him as a villain.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Hi, Hughie – I’m going to play the devil’s advocate here to inspire discussion among all of us. 🙂 While no one will disagree that we all disliked the dismantling process, was there really another choice Chris could have made? Given 98 losses and a $200 mill payroll, should Chris have gone out and spent even more in order to field a slightly better team that still would have finished well below .500? Would spending more than any other team to still have MLB’s worst record look good? Can teams that bad actually turn around in a year or two? Let’s get the conversations going, everyone! – Holly

      Liked by 2 people

      • Devil’s advocate redux: the rebuild has been poorly handled going on six years and counting as good players were let go for little or literally nothing in return. Illitch parlayed this teardown to become tied as the richest owner in the MLB while the team is still years away from really competing. It never had to be this way. It appears Illich is interested in personal wealth, not baseball, not Detroit.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Hi, Dave (and everyone else) – I like how we’re getting a conversation thread going. So I’ll play devil’s advocate once again so we keep this going. (First, a clarification. Richest owner is the entire Ilitch family, not just him and it includes the entire Ilitch Holdings, not just the Tigers.) So here are the questions to consider….

        Should Ilitch take all the blame for the poor trades? (Pl. remember that a discussion of Avila will be next week.)

        What suggestions would anyone have that would have made this rebuild situation better? Remember, Mr. I was still in charge through 2016. Chris took over in 2017. What could he have done so “it never had to be this way”?

        Do owners have an obligation to place fans ahead of running a financially-stable team?

        OK, who wants to chime in next? – Holly

        Like

      • Even agreeing that Chris Ilitch inherited a mess, I’m not willing to give him such a pass on his first four years in charge. He still oversaw the hiring of Ron Gardenhire; oversaw the doubling down on eyeball scouts in 2017; oversaw the restraint of the analytics function even as lip service was being paid to it; still oversaw all those terrible salary dumps for which we got practically nothing back likely because analytics were looped out.

        Liked by 3 people

      • I’m gonna guess Chris Ilitch didn’t move sooner on structural changes for the organization because he had no one inside the organization yet with enough insight and experience to point him in the right direction. Now he does. Wonder who could be … ? 😁

        Liked by 1 person

      • Chris Ilitch had ample time to adequately plan for the eventual takeover and management of the Tigers. What baffles me is there appeared to be no comprehensive plan for the future in place when the cost cutting began. For example, keeping poor and outdated management in the front office almost guaranteed that opportunities would be missed despite the cost cutting. Why wasn’t improvement and modernization of management planned for and started 4 years earlier?

        Liked by 3 people

      • And to add to T.A.S.’s comment, Chris I still has Smokes in the front office somewhere, along with all of the other “Advisor’s” who have played for the Tiger’s in the past.

        Liked by 3 people

      • In reference to the “cronies corral”, it would have been a questionable business decision to have emptied the corral and had to fill it with higher priced people who were from the future. In fact those people would have been resistant to come to our shambles. I think that’s why Gardy was brought to baby sit the remnants of the dismantle.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Great analysis Holly in these last two excellent posts. Pro sports is such a unique business entity, in that the majority of fans (emotional “shareholders”) do not care if the billionaire owner loses money on the team or not. You mentioned Steve Cohen, who bought the debt-laden and losing Mets for a whopping $2.4 billion. Chris seems intent on running a profitable baseball operation, which doesn’t always lead to sustainable winning.

    Like

  5. Can’t wait for third installment. I did enjoy watching the Tigers more this year. I did start craving all the potential signings in the Mr. I years. Quite often I disappointed in the results. They were entertaining and that’s all you really ask. Maybe this is a better way seems to work for other clubs.

    Liked by 4 people

    • I have noticed over the years that watching a .500 ballclub is more interesting because you don’t know if they are going to win. Whereas, watching a .350 ballclub and a .600 ballclub gets boring because all they do is lose or win day in and day out. Maybe that is just me, though.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Yes Mike Ilitch brought this team to it’s knees by his reckless, thoughtless spending which Chris attempted to change, but Chris then made consistently horrible decisions beginning with the hiring of Avilla and keeping him employed making terrible decisions. To Chris it’s all about making money without regard to anything else… beginning with the fans satisfaction.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Hi, Tommy – One quick correction…..Chris didn’t hire Avila. Mr. I did. As for the rest of your Avila and Hinch comments, please save them for next week when we address this facet of the team. Thanks! – Holly

      Like

    • Chris I. was left with a mess to say the least. Mike I.’s worst hire was not Prince Fielder, it was Brad Asmus. Why did Mike pick him? I think he liked him like an adopted son. Who carried the flag from Tiger stadium to Comerica park? Brad became manager of a team with tons of talent with no clue how to manage. Lost years. Try this – imagine A.J. Hinch running that team.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Hi, Jumpin’ Jack – Ausmus was picked by Jim Leyland and recommended by Gene Lamont who worked with him. Lamont was no fool as it would most probably guarantee him to keep the bench job under Ausmus, which it did. Stories had Mr. I balking at the hire and finally giving in. – Holly

        Liked by 3 people

  7. Holly, superb analysis as usual. When Mr.I bought the Wings, they were at least as bad as the current Tigers. The turnaround began when they hired Bowman (Wing’s AJ?). I’ve always believed CI was not going to sell. I still think CI honors his dad and will want a championship for Mr.I’s legacy. Being a smart business person he recognized the financial foundation had to be solid. The Tigers are not the Mets. We are a small market team and can not sustain the red ink the large market teams can.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Great series Holly. In past I’ve critized Chris for his resembling another Detroit owner. Much due to his own quotes. Yet as often as two people’s words can be the same yet it’s usually the tone of voice that implies the attitude of the speaker. Positive or negative. Still watching Chris actions as we’re in a new phase with both sports teams.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Holly, I have to circle back to your claim that the Tigers had practically double the operating expenses of any other team. Two questions: (1) If salary is not the lion’s share of those expenses, as you seem to indicate, what did the Tigers spend money on, or more money on, than any other team? And (2) what is your source for this? Is there a public source for this, or do you somehow have insider info? If it is public, would love to see a link to it. Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, T.A.S. – I debated whether to get into the details of operating expenses in baseball but there is so much detail involved in what is included that I would have put everyone to sleep. You can Google it. As for sources, I don’t have inside info. I do read a lot of business publications which is where I get as much financial info as I can. As the operating expenses was published app. 5 years ago – and I wrote about it then – I don’t remember exactly where I read it. It could be a source such as Crain’s, WSJ or Forbes where I often go. Thanks for the question! – Holly

      Like

      • I agree with TAS, and certainly wouldn’t find it boring to read a summary of what was included in operating expenses that caused them to be twice what other teams were spending.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hi, T2 – Careful what you wish for in terms of accounting details. 🙂 I will say that since the Tigers are privately-owned, there is no public breakdown of their financials. As to why they spent so much on operating costs? We’ll never know as we’re not privvy to their books. There’s no breakdown given only a total number. Thanks for adding to the discussion! – Holly

        Liked by 1 person

  10. As it pertains to Chris Ilitch being a good businessman, it may interest many that yesterday Sinclair, who owns and operates BSD, indicated in a shareholder conference call that their new contract with the Tigers includes “direct to consumer and other digital rights.” This means that next year those fans who could not get access to BSD on their streaming service may be able to watch the games by subscribing to an app on their smart TV or their phone, tablet or laptop.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Keeping the conversation going (per Holly’s request), I believe Chris was content with Avila as his inherited GM while he considered selling the team during the tear-down. Then something happened to change his mind (profitability perhaps), keep the team, and make it competitive.

    Like

    • Hi, McWatt – Wow, everyone wants to discuss Avila today! But we’re saving him for next week so please save your other comments for then. I expect comments will be overflowing on Tuesday. 🙂 Thanks! – Holly

      Like

  12. CI so far as been just like MI when he bought the team in the early 90’s as MI put very little money into the team until after the disastrous 2003 season while spending loads of $ on the Red Wings during the same time. Granted once he did start spending $ he made decisions that end up crippling the franchise. However we have yet to see CI doing any significant spending on players although certainly has spent $ in other places in the organization.

    Like

  13. Great leaders have some impact beyond their back yard. That’s one reason they’re great. In what specific ways has CI, for all his money, been a leader among his MLB peers? And, on obligation: Why doesn’t he have any obligation to those who go to Comerica when there are so many other places to go, to those who endure price increases almost yearly without seeing an improved ball club, and a lot of other things that others on this blog may mention?

    Liked by 3 people

Comments are closed.