THE TIGERS NEED TO CHANGE THEIR STRIPES

by Holly Horning

With all the recent national news stories about the Tigers’ rebuild, I was reminded of something Chris Ilitch said over a year ago:

“… We want not only a highly competitive team, but we want to be a playoff contender and we want to compete for championships and do it on a long-term, sustainable basis…. Our goal is not to be good one time but to be good over the course of time. We really are shooting for sustainable success and competitive baseball over time.”

Note the bolded text.

Flash-forward to just a couple weeks ago and Ken Rosenthal’s scathing article about the Tigers’ mess of a rebuild.  Ken said:

“Rival executives, however, question whether Avila is creative and savvy enough to build a consistent winner.”

Houston, er, Detroit, we’ve got a problem.

An owner who wants a successful, sustainable team.  And a GM considered by many of his peers to be incapable of delivering that.

It’s one thing for people to say that someone isn’t up to the task.  It’s another when it’s your peers.

I just hope that Chris has read this article.  At least once.

In addition to the Rosenthal article, I also recently wrote about the national article comparing the Giants and Tigers rebuilds.  Both started the same year but it took San Francisco only 4 years to reach their goal.  And they did it without tearing down the roster.

Over the weekend, there was another national article on the Orioles’ rebuild.  They started a year after the Tigers and it appears that they are coming out of their rebuild this year.  Five years for them.

So what do the Orioles and Giants have in common?

Great leaders who know how to rebuild. 

Of course, Farhan Zaidi for the Giants.  And Mike Elias for the Birds.  He was hired as the GM in 2019 to turn the team around.  He’s been their GM for not even 3 full years.

He worked for the Astros as Director of Scouting and is credited with finding 10 of the players on the World Champion roster, including Carlos Correa. 

Currently, their farm system is one of the best.  Out of their top 10 players, 5 of them are classified as having “elite”- level skills.

Elias also speaks of creating a “sustained winner” by building an “elite talent pipeline” via analytics, player development and scouting.

In less than 1 year after becoming the GM, Mike broomed much of the organization.   Over 2 dozen new hires just in the Front Office.  Over 65 new scouts, analysts and player development people, too.

After his second year, the Orioles last place analytics department (1 person) now matches Houston’s which is considered the best in MLB.

Elias also added an entirely new manager and coaching staff from outside the organization.  He kept 1 major executive and fired 8 others.

For the new Player Development department, 2 new directors and 25 minor league instructors came on board.  Several hold overs stayed while 17 were let go.

The Orioles then hired more than 12 new minor league coaches, replacing the entire staff at their A level and created 5 new divisional positions.

They also revamped their entire strength and conditioning staffs.

Elias even tackled the international and domestic scouting areas.  For the latter, 17 scouts were fired.

Like Theo Epstein with the Cubs, Elias broomed much of the organization and changed the entire corporate culture of the organization.

This is the key to success.  If you don’t have a winning organization, you need to look within and make significant changes. 

You need to ensure that everyone has the same vision. 

You need to ensure that everyone buys into the same plan. 

You need to ensure that everyone knows the goals and can meet them.

You need to ensure that every employee can successfully make the changes in order to meet the organization’s goals.

These points were originally emphasized by Epstein.  And every organization that has broomed their old culture and replaced it with proven attitudes and skills has gone on to win.

So what about the Tigers?

Even though they made changes to their manager and coaches, and hired several new heads (incl. Player Development), they haven’t done nearly enough.

The organization was not broomed.  Not even close.

A handful of employees were released.  But what is telling is that the team could not outright fire one of the Front Office’s major department heads and instead, demoted him to another position.

The Tigers recently sent David Chadd, Jim Leyland and Asst. Director of Amateur Scouting Eric Nieto, to scout players from IMG (a high school).  Nieto has been with the Tigers for 9 years.

Chadd was part of the Marlins clique, having been hired by Dave Dombrowski and working with both Al Avila and Jim Leyland. After a stint as a scouting director for the Red Sox (less than 2 years), Chadd was brought to Detroit by Al Avila where he has remained for the last 17 years.

At one point, Chadd was responsible for the draft but that job ended up being taken away and given to Scott Pleis to oversee.

Leyland is described as the “big dog”  for the Tigers when it comes to scouting players.  It was admitted that when there are serious players to evaluate, the Tigers send Leyland.

He’s admitted he doesn’t know how to do projections but that he (sic) “knows a good player when he sees one.”

Greeeat………

What are the chances that this Tigers trio were all pulling out their computers and checking the stats that other teams were analyzing?

While most teams are all using super computers to analyze the data, it appears that the Tigers are still just fine with employees still using the equivalent of abacuses and calculators. Or, “knowing a good player when he sees one.”

It’s these 3 who were asked to help contribute in deciding which players would be taken in the upcoming MLB draft.  Three of IMG’s high school students are expected to be drafted in the first 3 rounds of the draft.

You simply can’t make this stuff up.

And this is an indicator of how the Tigers believe they will create “sustainable success and competitive baseball over time.”

You know what they say about doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

It’s also one of the reasons why this team is on year #6 in its rebuild and nowhere near close to becoming competitive anytime soon.

How many other teams will jump ahead of the Tigers in rebuilding?  How many other teams will it take for changes to be made?

(Editor’s Note: This story was revised to correct the information about David Chadd. Seems this author confused her “David”s and initially listed Dave Littlefield’s background under David Chadd’s name.)

Don’t see your comment? Comments are limited to a maximum of 3 sentences. Please make sure to check out the other rules for posting under the link at the top of the page.


What did you miss on our Twitter feed yesterday?

  • Another setback for a player who has missed most of this year.

Why should you follow Totally Tigers https://twitter.com/totallytigersbb on Twitter?

  • We tweet out breaking news before it’s published in the sports pages. The best news from the best sources.
  • Want more than 1 Totally Tigers fix every day? How about throughout the day?

24 thoughts on “THE TIGERS NEED TO CHANGE THEIR STRIPES

  1. Holly,your well researched articles are great but yet eye opening. It is beyond belief how backwards and incompetent our leadership is. Year in and year out its reflected in the standings. I am almost to the point where I give up totally, at least until we have a new owner and GM.

    Liked by 7 people

  2. There are “doers” and there are “talkers”, with Chris being one of the latter. The money he wasted on this year’s team shows he’s put his faith in a poorly run organization. And as to our “pipeline” progress, look no further than the highly-touted Jackson Jobe and his 5.09 ERA at single-A Lakeland (worst on that staff).

    Liked by 10 people

  3. After reading this, and many other thoughtful and carefully considered pieces on the subject, I can only wonder…..Why are we still beating ourselves up over this outfit? It doesn’t make much sense any more. Sad state of affairs.

    Liked by 8 people

  4. It amazes me how much the Tigers have adopted the traditional Lions business model in recent years. Fire someone in upper management, promote from within for key positions, and just rearrange the org structure with the same tired old people. Sprinkle in the occasional new hire from outside the organization (who usually goes on to blossom elsewhere), and rinse, wash, and repeat.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. JL doesn’t like analytics, won’t buy into analytics, and seemingly fights Avilia’s attempt to work analytics into the dugout. So why in the world does CI allow his presence when scouting possible draft choices? smh

    Liked by 6 people

    • Illitch has not required accountability. He is a passive owner who lacks our emotional investment in the team. He still garners the goodwill felt toward his dad, and I have a hunch that if his name was Chris Jones he would be hearing many more catcalls.

      Liked by 6 people

      • This one I have to disagree with you on, Hughie. CI didn’t get to where he is by being passive in anything he does. He also doesn’t strike me as someone who doesn’t hold people accountable. He is a smart man, and I bet is articulate in everything he does, and his hands are likely very dirty in this rebuild. I agree with you on the goodwill part, though.

        Liked by 2 people

  6. How long is this going to go on! Holly is spot on again. And the worst thing of all that wasn’t mentioned, and so obvious, is that this team is boring! It’s hard to watch…

    Liked by 6 people

  7. As with most organizations, the problems start at the very top, in this case CI. He extended AA even with his poor track record. AA, Leyland and Chadd are all DD people so you shouldn’t expect that to change under AA. I don’t expect CI to fire AA until his contract is, whenever that is.

    Liked by 3 people

    • We need to remember that CI had a huge tax liability with the inheritance, so he told AA to tear down, cut salary, and wait until he recovered his money or sold the team, and this is why AA’s contract was extended indefinitely. Knowing it was going to take years, I suspect there wasn’t much desire on CI’s part to begin a rebuild.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. Chris Illitch is pleased with the progress this team has made. He hasn’t progressed beyond Jim Leyland (and Al Avila). Or fourth place in the division.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. It all starts at the top…Chris Ilitch! As long as he calls the shots, there is no hope, and this team will fail. I’m 82, so chances of my witnessing Tigers’ success are slim. As I see it, the only real chance is to boycott until CI loses so much profit that he has no choice but to leave, and those chances are absent.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. I find it very interesting about the Orioles. Holly, It seems like it was just last year when you stated things were bad in Baltimore because the owners did not have a clue as to what they were doing. We can only hope the same eventually happens here….a turn around.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. It seems that alot of fans are victims of revisionist history when it comes to the Ilitch family ownership of the Tigers (especially in comparisons between father Mike and son Chris). Mike bought the team in 1992 and under his leadership had exactly 1 winning season (’93) prior to the ’06 World Series team (14 years later). In that time he went thru 5 GMs and 7 Managers before he found the winning combo.

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.