IN THE BALLPARK

by Holly Horning

It’s nothing new for baseball teams to build new stadiums or tweak existing ones in order to accommodate the home team.

When the Tigers built Comerica, some of the outfield dimensions were made insanely deep in order to accommodate their pitching staff which was one of the worst in MLB.  Build it deeper and pitchers will give up fewer homeruns.

But then again, more outfield expanse means you need better and faster defensive outfielders.  That’s why Detroit eventually ended up bringing those walls in.

In Baltimore, the Orioles just announced that they will not only be moving their outfield fences back 30 feet, but they are also raising them.  It’s to help reduce the number of home runs that are being hit there, combined with their rebuilding efforts and inexperienced pitchers.

And some are now arguing that by moving outfield fences back (and even raising the wall height), baseball could be saved.

With fewer home runs thus being attempted, the game could become more exciting.

Baseball has been reduced to strikeouts, home runs and walks.  (Known at the “three true outcomes.”)  It used to be that they filled 2 out of every 9 innings.  Now it’s up to 3.5 innings out of 9.

And it makes for a very boring game.

What do these three have in common?

Besides the all-or-nothing approach, it’s failure to put the ball in play.  And a result, less action on the field.  Less running.  Less catching.  Less…. well, you get it.

But what if certain ballparks also pushed their walls back?  What are the advantages?

  • Fewer attempts at home runs.  More attempts to simply connect to the ball.
  • More hits that would get past the outfielders and roll longer.
  • Outfielders would play deeper and more balls would fall in front of them.
  • Playing deeper in the outfield would result in larger gaps that would create more extra base hits, “gappers” and more diving catches.
  • Playing deeper would result in more players being thrown out trying to stretch out a hit.
  • Home run hitters with less plate discipline would become less valuable as they would hit more fly outs or doubles.
  • Outfielders would become more valuable.
  • Foot speed would become more valuable.
  • Triples would become more frequent.
  • Pitchers would become more fearless with the reduction in home runs.
  • Batters would be better at plate discipline because they would see more pitches and wait for the right one.
  • Pitch counts would increase while strikeouts and walks would lessen.
  • Contact hitting would increase.

But the best benefit of all?

  • The shift would become dangerous and used much less. 

Gaps in the bigger ballparks would increase the risk that hits would create more extra-bases.  As a result, defense would be pulled back to more of a traditional placement.

Sounds good, right?

The Tigers have hinted that there will be changes to Comerica starting with the 2022 season. Many have speculated that it will involve changing the dimensions of the park.

Will they be moving a wall or two further in – or out? There are arguments for both.

For the record, the distance from home plate to both the left field and right field corners are average lengths in MLB.  Even the distance to dead center field is not the longest in baseball.  There are a couple other parks that are bigger.

The Tigers don’t have their power hitters anymore so it makes sense that they pull their walls in to increase production.

However, this would put increased pressure on their young starting pitchers.

And if the walls are pulled in, it doesn’t seem likely that the team will return to the days of the mighty HR hitter who is a below-average runner. 

It doesn’t seem like A. J. Hinch’s style. He often talks about developing athletic players who are defensively flexible.

But what about the height of the walls?  Could the Tigers do that?

Guess we’ll have to wait and see.

But if anyone has a pair of binoculars or a drone, you know what you need to do…….

(Only comments of 3-4 sentences are published. Please see the complete list of rules at the link above in order for your comments to appear.)


What did you miss on our Twitter feed yesterday? (And why aren’t you following TT yet?)

  • Why the players may have the upper hand in a new CBA.

Get your Totally Tigers fix beyond this blog.  We publish breaking news, national stories of note, videos, observations and polls throughout the day.  Every day.

Click here: https://twitter.com/totallytigersbb or simply enter “totally tigers bb” (make sure you add the “bb”!) in the search box at twitter.com and click on “Follow.”

18 thoughts on “IN THE BALLPARK

  1. Don’t see your comment? Have you checked the rules for posting? Comments are only approved if they address today’s topic, do not exceed the 3-4 sentence length and meet all of the other requirements posted under the link at the top of the page. This also means NO CAPS. Please make sure to check them out!

    Like

  2. I have never understood why the HR, K and BB are considered the 3 true outcomes. 2 of the 3 are much more tied at most times to the umpire and not the pitcher. As for changes to the park’s dimensions, AJ had his success in a LL park with a decent contact team that played defense. I don’t see those as a strength, yet, for the Tigers. Comerica, much more than most admit, is basically a neutral hitter’s park and has been for years.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I never was a fan of moving the fences in at Comerica when an exciting, winning team could’ve been built to fit where the team plays half its games. And how much fun it would be to see a visiting team of sluggers launch soaring outs to the warning track while our team of slap-hitting, gap-hitting rabbits wear down their pitchers and drive them nuts on the bases. That’s the baseball I want to see. And remember, when the game was born there were no fences.

    Liked by 7 people

    • From your mouth McWatt to the baseball gods’ ears! Sandlots never had fences and I really think the only reason MLB created them was to make for more fannies in the seats. Nothing is more exciting than a triple or a rifle shot from the right-field corner to nail that pesky base runner who overestimated his speed.

      Liked by 7 people

  4. If dimensions and/or wall height are changing for the Copa, then I feel confident the powers to be will tailor them to fit the club to be. In the past, player choices were made with little regard to fitting our park; I believe that ship has sailed because a lot of the old braintrust is on board. As to the shift, if it is lessened, defense will need to offset the extra pressure on our young staff.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. I think the major leagues should have a rule that requires all teams to have the same outfield dimensions. It would result in all teams playing on a “level playing field”.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I agree with the “level playing field” in the literal sense, Tommy. Those hills in center field were a dumb idea. But different outfield dimensions make parks unique and are part of the history of the game. What would Fenway be without the Green Monster? And who doesn’t miss the overhang in right field at Tiger Stadium?

      Liked by 4 people

    • You mean like every other sport?? ((Actually, there are minor differences in hockey rinks but we’re talking a couple of feet, NOT 15 yards.)) 🙂

      Like

  6. At Fenway I once saw Ivan Rodriquez make 2 nifty defensive plays due to the ball staying in the park. First, with a runner on second and the batter singling, I-Rod ran up toward the pitcher’s mound to shorten the throw to home and nailed the hitter, attempting to take second on the throw home. Second, I-Rod picked off a runner at first. Push the fences out.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. If fences are pushed out, the players will be back on ‘roids again. Or, there will be no more hitters inducted into the HOF because they didn’t reach 500 HR’s. 😉

    Like

  8. Rumor says The Tigers have considered several things. First, adding more box seats down the foul lines. They have plenty of space to do so. The dugouts would be made a little smaller. Also, they would move the fences in, in deep right center field where the scoreboard sits. The fence there is well over 400 feet. They would add seats in left field where the bullpens now sit and move the bull pens into right center field. T

    Like

  9. As an old outfielder, I would much rather see a great catch or throw than a HR. If I remember correctly, wasn’t Tiger Stadium 440’ to center and 365’ down the LF line?

    Liked by 4 people

  10. Moving walls in to generate more outfield action and balls in play on a universal basis would require most if not all teams to later their own ballparks to comply, which would entail removing or obstructing seats for many, so that won’t happen. And those who do comply would be unilaterally surrendering their new slap-hitting little-ball teams to power-hitting teams in their unchanged home parks.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Not that I’d favor it, but imagine a forty-foot high screen above the fence that wouldn’t restrict the fans’ view and would keep long balls in play. It’s been done before. When the Dodgers first moved to LA and played in the Coliseum they had a screen like that in LF where it was 250 feet down the line. No screen was needed in RF where it was 440 feet to reach the fence.

      Liked by 2 people

  11. Oh for the days of Comerica national park. I hate what those spoiled sluggers like Juan Gonzalez and bobby higgenson matured into. Take out the left field bull pen and return the park to it’s original size. Ty Cobb would love it.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.