BIRDS OF A FEATHER….

by Holly Horning

Last week, I wrote about the significant number of Dodgers who have been hired by the Tigers.

And a few readers expressed some concern about so many people being hired from the same organization.  A fear that the Tigers are trading 1 clique for another.

But there are a number of huge differences when comparing the old band of brothers with the new guys.

And it’s all very good news.

The fact is that the Dodgers have MLB’s best player development system.  Not even close.

All of these new employees haven’t worked together in a single cohesive group.  They simply come from a variety of levels and sub-departments within the Dodgers organization, not from a single small clique.

If you are doing the hiring, wouldn’t you want the very best people to come to your organization?  Of course you would.

And if you were in charge of the hiring, wouldn’t you want to bring someone on board you knew did excellent work?  Someone with a track history that you knew?  Of course you would.

You always want to hire people you know can do the work and meet the goals instead of people with whom you’re not familiar.

With that said, what makes the Dodgers’ player development system the best in the business?

Let me count the ways….

First, the team has won 7 straight NL titles with last year resulting in a 106-win season.  Of course, this amount of success means you pick very low in the draft year after year.  In LA’s case, the highest they have selected was 18th.  Yet, they’ve maintained a top 5 farm system for the last 6 years in row.

Someone knows what they are doing.  Even when they are further hampered by all the rules – and the benefits given to small-market clubs and tanking teams – meant to inhibit single-team dominance.

More than one GM has said that the Dodgers are the model for the rest of baseball.  And now the Tigers have brought a number of them on board.

So how is LA doing it?

They are addressing all aspects of the development process from the mental makeup to the skills and to the physical programs that create the best and healthiest minds and bodies.

Despite the fact that they are technically signing lesser players because of the draft order, they continue to pick better than teams drafting higher.  Their prospects reach the majors faster and older players end up improving dramatically when they sign with the team.

LA manages to maintain a consistent prospect pipeline.  Free agents leave yet the team is continually replenished with homegrown stars.

The team has immense depth that allows them to easily add a major player from outside the organization via trade. Their system keeps churning out top quality prospects.

The Dodgers seriously invest in player development.  They lead in scouting, player welfare and having the best coaches and development staffers.

And it all starts in the minors.

Their minor league facilities rank among the best in terms of quality and equipment.

Stories over the past couple years point to the hardships experienced by MLB prospects from training facilities to housing to food.  Stories from clubhouse managers who speak about having to hunt for leftovers or serve peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.  Even fast food.

Three of the 5 Dodger affiliates have traveling chefs.  The other two get catered meals from Whole Foods.

Scouts are on the record saying that it is very noticeable that the Dodger prospects are in great shape and look better than most of the other organizations’ players.

Their medical, training and conditioning staffs are rated “excellent.”  The latter two are ranked the best in MLB.

What the Dodgers have done, in a nutshell, is to emphasize superior physical development in all of their players.

Now, let’s turn to their scouting and drafting programs. 

No team turns out more home-grown players.  Players like Cody Bellinger, Walker Buehler, Grant Holmes, Gavin Lux, Dustin May, Joc Pedeson, Corey Seager, Will Smith, Ross Stripling and Alex Verdugo.  This, btw, is the abbreviated list.

Then you’ve got the MLB-level players who came to LA and vastly improved:  Max Muncy, Chris Taylor and Justin Turner, to name a few.

In scouting, the Dodgers look for athletic, multi-tool players who are versatile.  They look at players with great plate discipline, hit for average, solid bat speed, superior hand-eye coordination and pitch recognition.  They’re not looking for power because they add it after the player signs.  The theory is if you have quality at-bats and great contact skills, then the power can be successfully developed with swing adjustments.

The most important quality in a prospect?  Someone who is open to change.

All of this translates into rookies coming up more quickly than others and experiencing somewhat seamless transitions.  It’s because the Dodgers help eliminate the learning curves.  One reason why they had back-to-back Rookie of the Years.

Player programs are individualized  Even before their first day, all the coaches know what the prospects have been doing and have written plans in place, ready to enact.

Does this sound familiar?  Chris Fetter, a Dodger alum, was doing that this year in Detroit.

The newest Tiger employees are trying to duplicate what they learned in LA.  And it also includes what is described as the most important characteristic of the Dodgers’ organization.

The corporate culture. 

From the scouting to the clubhouse and every step in-between.  It is described as “positive”, “empowering”, “creating lifelong learners” and possessing a “tremendous work ethic.”

A culture that allows the players to focus on just playing and not how to conform or succumb to pressure.  A culture that is focused on keeping players moving forward, staying comfortable and progressing smoothly.  That’s why they transition to the big leagues so easily.

We saw Akil Baddoo exemplify this during the last season.  We also heard that the Tigers were frustrated at how Casey Mize, Spencer Turnbull and Tarik Skubal had rocky starts to their MLB debuts.

And when your top prospects are struggling, it sends up red flags.

The Tigers went through 5+ years of sheer hell trying to get these top draft picks.  It’s now time to undo the damage and get them back on track.

And it’s about time.


(Please follow the rules at the link above, incl. comments limited to a max of 3-4 sentences, in order to be published.)


What did you miss on our Twitter feed yesterday? (And why aren’t you following TT yet?)

  • Why we’re sad that Brad Ausmus didn’t make the final cut for the Mets’ manager opening.

Get your Totally Tigers fix beyond this blog.  We publish breaking news, national stories of note, videos, observations and polls throughout the day.  Every day.

Click here: https://twitter.com/totallytigersbb or simply enter “totally tigers bb” (make sure you add the “bb”!) in the search box at twitter.com and click on “Follow.”

17 thoughts on “BIRDS OF A FEATHER….

  1. Don’t see your comment? Have you checked the rules for posting? Comments are only approved if they address today’s topic, do not exceed the 3-4 sentence length and meet all of the other requirements posted under the link at the top of the page. This also means NO CAPS. Please make sure to check them out!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am skeptical about any organization’s ability to import a “culture”, (See Detroit Lions past effort to become the Patriots), however a Tiger fan has to be encouraged about the new blood and ideas at the player development level. Alas the bar has been set very low, but if Avila is committed to becoming a “life long learner” himself we might actually see some young players ready to joining a winning MLB team in a couple of years.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. Changing a culture of losing can’t be done in a piecemeal fashion. When losing is entrenched in a system a more comprehensive approach is required. I see Hinch as the most important hire, but Hinch, by himself would not have been enough to update and upgrade the Tigers fundamentally. Hiring people who see the big picture and know what they’re doing is more important than worrying about what school they attended.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. It sounds like the Dodgers have created a culture of service to their players. The focus is on doing whatever you can to make them healthy, relaxed and focused on performance. Easy to say and hard to do. Most places provide the basics and say show me what you’ve got young man.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. Holly, has there been a main impetuous to embracing the Dodger way.? The contributors to this blog would seem to favor AJ, but are others deeply jnvolved too like Al, his Dad, the coaches, CI, etc. I think the mold for the team level culture change began when the coaches checked into Lakeland; Lombard with his outfield planner in tow, Fetter having personal plans for each of his staff, etc..The coaches and their boss. AJ, came to Lakeland prepared to let the learning begin.

    Liked by 5 people

  6. The question now is how do the Tiger’s keep this momentum up? If Hinch were to jump ship via the opt out clause, will this house of cards fall? How many years will it take to instill this new “Tiger Way” in order to make it a lasting, forever, type of thing? The Owner, the GM, and the Manager must all be pulling this wagon in the same direction all of the time. Even a little breakdown can set it back many years.

    Liked by 5 people

  7. I’d love to see the Tigers bringing over some of the Dodgers medical, training and conditioning people. We seriously need to get rid of Kevin Rand, Doug Teeter and Company. Removing and replacing them with a more competent staff would go a long ways in keeping our players healthy and fit!!

    Liked by 6 people

  8. We Tiger fans are like the person who hits the lottery and spends all his time complaining about the taxes he’ll have to pay! Two years ago none of us could have predicted just how well this is going. Now that some of the upper management slots have been filled with more capable personnel I don’t think we will be hiring Asmus to replace him. For now, I’d like to see us concentrate on training/medical staff upgrades.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Ausmus had the Tigers playing a winning and exciting brand of baseball the first month. Moving runners, bunting and sacrificing, stealing bases. I then remember Leyland being critical, stating they were being too aggressive, taking too many chances. Things then changed, and the Tigers play was greatly toned down. Leyland and Lamont were constantly in Ausmus’ ear. It makes one wonder if things were unfettered, if Ausmus may have been more successful..

    Liked by 3 people

    • I don’t think so Nick. Remember that he was fired from the LA Angels after just one season because of their 72-90 record (which was their worst record since 1999). The Angels were outscored by 99 runs, despite a lineup including Mike Trout, Albert Pujols, Justin Upton Tommy LaStella, Andrelton Simmons and Shohei Ohtani (sounds familiar, right). I just don’t think Brad Ausmus is cut out to be a Manager!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Maybe he could have been a bit better, we’ll never know, but Brad was let go after only 1 year into his 3 year contract with the Angels in 2019 (And it was rough) and JImmy L and his boys were not there to criticize him then. Joe Maddon was his replacement

      Liked by 3 people

    • I’m not trying to defend him, but I find it difficult to say the Angels’ problems in 2019 were primarily Ausmus’ doing. Even with Ohtani and Trout, that line-up hasn’t had a .500 season since 2015, which says to me their problems run a lot deeper. Nick may be on to something when you stop to remember the reports about how excited the players were with the new drills and ideas they were being exposed to that 1st ST with BA, only to have it all slip away.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Installing a rookie manger, with no field experience, on a veteran team, counting down its last chances to win, was not a “baptism of fire”. I was a “throwing to the wolves”. Shame on the front office.

        Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.