DIFFERENT TIMES, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES

By:  Holly Horning

You, dear readers, come to our blog because you appreciate the unvarnished observations about our favorite baseball team. You come because you want to read viewpoints and information that is not available in the major Detroit newspapers or on any MLB-owned media. You come because we identify the reasons why the Tigers do what they do by looking beyond the dugout and the playing field.

We are square shooters. We tell it like we see it. And all we ask of you is to consider the information we present. For the record, we, in turn, read your comments and honor all perspectives.

We are grateful that we have a community here in which ideas and opinions can be shared respectfully – and that we can even learn a thing or two from one another. There is no cancel culture here. There is no planned attack to disparage anyone who doesn’t share the identical idea by the poster. Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing. How many other sites can claim this?

What we ask of you is to consider everyone’s opinions. I know we are all tired of those who work overtime trying to validate every bad move made by the Tigers. But in turn, there are also those who can see no good in anything the Tigers do.

Neither of these extremes work.

Shouldn’t we all be willing to escape our comfort zones and explore opinions other than our own? Isn’t that how we learn?

All of this now brings us to today’s blog. A chance to play devil’s advocate and present the case for why the Tigers are currently doing (or not doing) what they are.

I know we’ve been tough on the team. And quite frankly, it’s been hard not to considering what’s been going on since (the most recent years, that is) probably the inexplicable hiring of Brad Ausmus. But running a baseball team is not a black or white issue. It’s complicated. And there are many issues those in charge have to face. And often, those issues compete directly with each other.

Many of them major issues and the determining factors that chart the team’s direction. Many of them issues that the team has no control over.

So let’s tackle that today. Let’s understand what the Tigers can and cannot do. Let’s understand how life today has impacted the team’s actions.

And let’s understand that when anyone makes an argument in favor of the team, that it doesn’t mean that they’ve “switched sides.” In fact, when you can both support and condemn actions of any group, it means you have the ability to make honest observations.

And that is a good thing.

Which brings us to the annual assessment of the Tigers’ actions since that first weekend in October. You know, the zillions of grades by the media and other blogs given in response to the moves made – or not made – by the team. The firings, if any. The hirings. The expected moves that are supposed to so clearly scream improvement.

And we’ve read the ones about the Tigers. The disappointment in the lack of moves. The disappointment in the profile level of the players acquired. The disappointment in the people and players who remain with the team.

But is it fair to blame the entire organization for what has – or hasn’t – happened?

Let’s start with the players Al Avila has acquired since October. Everyone is in agreement that none of them have moved the needle. But is this all upon Al?

Maybe it is to some degree when it concerns the specific players he signs. But let’s also remember that he doesn’t set the budget. Chris Ilitch does. And maybe, just maybe, Avila is hamstrung in the players he can acquire because of that. Maybe his pool of desirable candidates is on the short side because they all want more than he is able to offer.

Maybe he has so many holes to fill that he needs to spread the money around as thinly as possible in order to fill them all. (Those gaps are another issue and deserving of their own extensive discussion, but not today.) Would some fans prefer that he put most of the budget in one player and leave gaping holes everywhere else?

There is one thing for which I am sure. That every GM in the history of the game has used every single dollar he is given to sign players. He’s not saving up to sign Mike Trout. In fact, almost every GM probably goes begging to ownership for more payroll dollars every year in order to sign the players he wants.

So it’s not right to say that Al Avila is cheap. But maybe his boss is.

And then there’s a factor that neither owner nor GM has much, or any, control over.

In a recent survey of baseball agents, they revealed that other than Toronto (for being outside of the US and the complications it creates in travel and relocating one’s family), the one city most players request that they not be traded to – or entertain offers from – is Detroit. Mostly because of the city itself. Secondarily because of the questions surrounding the pace of the rebuild.

And all of that narrows down the field of who you can sign. And how much you need to pay them to reconsider. Let’s not forget how Mr. I had to overpay Pudge Rodriguez in order for him to come to Detroit.

However, the two biggest factors in Detroit’s lack of significant movement this off-season are due to both the industry’s movement and what is going on in the world.

Three letters – CBA. It is expiring in less than a year and reports have both sides doing little to nothing yet when most contract talks start at least a year in advance. Heck, the owners and players are battling it out over small points, like the universal DH, related to this year’s play. This doesn’t bode well, folks.

Everyone is reporting that the animosity between both sides has escalated tremendously and is at its worst in decades. Even the majority of the afore-mentioned agents believe there will be a work stoppage after this year.

Given such, is it in the team’s best interest to invest more in multi-year contracts this year when it is likely that play will be shortened next year? When the players you’ve signed are only going to get older and potentially lose a measurable portion of their value once the game resumes?

Let’s not forget that Chris Ilitch sits on one of the Commissioner’s committees so he is well-informed as to what those involved in the game are saying.

And finally, there is one factor that is the all-time game changer. The one factor that no one can control.

The pandemic.

We’ve just gone through a “season” where teams played a fraction of their games and the seats were empty. Other than media contracts, teams were not pulling in app. 40%-60% of their yearly revenue.

A huge question mark remains over the 2021 season. When will it start? Will the increase in infections and dangerous mutations in the virus shut things down again? And what about the fans? Will they be able to attend? And if so, how many will be allowed? There have been no decisions yet and no ruling on whether or not fans will be allowed to attend this year.

If you’re a smart businessperson – and all of these owners are – how many are going to push all their chips to the middle of the table when it comes to betting against the global scourge?

As it is, every single team after this last year has gone into cost-cutting mode in one or more multiple ways. Some teams have made drastic cuts to their employees and operations. Some so seriously so that it puts their viability within the game at risk.

The Tigers have been one of the luckier organizations, however they have also had to make some significant cuts within their organization. Cuts that need to offset the cash flow issues. Cuts that can’t be used to justify spending more on players.

Simply put, there is a huge question mark hanging over this season and the next one as well. So isn’t it wise for the Tigers to be more cautious right now until everyone learns more about how Covid will impact the 2021 season?

Could the Tigers Front Office also be waiting to make more moves closer to Opening Day when they may be able to strike some very favorable deals and get some bargains as a result? Wouldn’t that be a smarter move?

It’s really too soon to pass judgment on what the team has done so far in preparation for the coming year. It’s a different world, a different time. And it’s a time to do things differently as a result.

Let’s wait just a little while longer before passing judgment.


Get your Totally Tigers fix beyond this blog.  Follow us on Twitter where we post and dissect additional new content every day, the Totally Tigers way!  Simply enter “Totally Tigers” in the search box at twitter.com.

Totally Tigers loves your comments but please be aware of the rules for posting.  Comments may be edited and responses are only published if they address today’s topic, are respectful and do not exceed the maximum number of 3-4 sentences.  All rules may be found by clicking on the link at the top of the page.

 

34 thoughts on “DIFFERENT TIMES, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES

  1. Al Avila has failed to modernize the Tiger’s organization and take advantage of opportunities so that it is a desirable place where players want to come to have a fruitful career. The hiring of Hinch may be an attempt to overcome the perception that the Tigers organization is a place to avoid. It may not be enough to overcome the problems Al Avila’s tenure as GM have created.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. With all due respect Holly, and you know I offered you the GM job if I ever own the team, I think Tom Sawyer just gave you a great deal on the whitewash. As for all the outside forces, every team is faced with the same challenges. I’m not even going to discuss what the team coulda, shoulda, woulda done but it would be nice to see at least one winning move. As for waiting a little longer, some of us have been waiting for 26 years.

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Good piece, overall. Given the current state of the Tigers, in my opinion it doesn’t make a lot of sense to spend big on free agents and/or make blockbuster trades until it is know what this season might look like in matters related to C-19 and a new CBA is in place.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. The Tigers could have done nothing worse than the hiring of Brad Ausmus, a great waste of time and the team went downhill very quickley and yet has a lot of work to come out the swamp. Not all Avila’s fault but he should learn from DD how not to put all his playing cards on the table. Right now not the right time to make big signings.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Holly you make many wonderful points. In my case, the organization used up any and all good will I had toward it the last few years. I think the Tigers have poor ownership, an inept front office, and have been on the road to nowhere. If I felt there were a true vision for the future of the club, I would be on board. The Hinch hiring is a start, but I see it more as a marriage of convenience. Once again, I hope they prove me wrong!

    Liked by 9 people

  6. Great article as usual, after watching a team like the Rays put a competitive team on the field with a limited budget, shows the FO needs a refresh.

    Liked by 5 people

  7. Chris Ilitch has been steering this team for years now, and the result has been a dismal failure…starting with the hiring of Al Avilla, who is one of the worst GMs in the majors. Their failed management of the Tigers has simply trickled down through the players on the field leaving this city with a losing team year after year. Since Ilitch nearly vows to remain the owner, there is no hope.

    Like

    • Hi, Tommy – Actually, it was Mr. I who hired Avila, who is described as “son-like” to the Ilitch family and reported to be much- favored over Dave Dombrowski. For the record, Chris has only been running the team for just about 4 years now. – Holly

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Holly, I respect your opinion but disagree with premise of waiting to pass judgement. Avila has shown to make questionable signings, overpay for “talent”, and seems to tank trade value by oversharing. Chris I is enabling him with the low budget (I remember reading from you that there was no profit under Mr. I but there is under Chris) and what seems to be a lack of interest by his hands-off approach (Al announced his own extension without the owner present).

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hi, Steve – If you go back to my blog, I do make mention of that. These are 2 separate issues and this blog is not dedicated to Al’s skills as GM but merely to the overall issue about how the team is approaching this year given some major issues that will impact all of baseball. But it sounds like you’ve been reading and remembering my blogs, so I thank you for that! 😉 – Holly

      Liked by 1 person

  9. People have been hard on Avila and the Tiger organization, and it has been warranted. However, looking at the Hot Stove league, actually that stove is shut down due to lack of fuel. There are only five teams or so that have been active this winter, and that’s it. Few teams are doing anything of relative significance. It is what it is.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I think this column is awesome even though I had to check the calendar to make sure it’s not April 1. Regarding the agent survey about players not wanting to come to Detroit, maybe the Tigers need to hire former pitcher Edwin Jackson as a recruiter. MLB.com did a story about him a couple days ago and made this comment: “You probably wouldn’t think of Detroit as being fun, but it’s a cool city. The culture there is dope. A lot of places to go.”

    Liked by 4 people

  11. Another way to look at it is that in a chaotic downturn, assets are undervalued. It is highly unlikely that premium ballplayers will ever be cheaper than they are now.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Cheaper this year, yes, but will they sign for more than 1 or 2 years? I say 2 years because they probably realize that getting a contract will be even more difficult after this season when they go into the Collective Bargaining season.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Effective leaders have the ability to find opportunities amongst the problems they encounter. Al Avila has trouble taking advantage of obvious opportunities let alone exploiting hidden or less obvious ones.

      Liked by 6 people

  12. I concur 100% with today’s blog. I have been trying to say this for a long time. CI doesn’t want to spend. Perhaps due to the inheritance taxes and the huge payroll he took control of. Certainly the CBA has something to do with it. The pandemic came along and provided cover for CI to not spend more even though he wasn’t going to anyway.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. So many challenges, yet the one area providing the most bang for the buck and presenting the fewest obstacles is being ignored – player development. This team needs to be rebuilt from the ground up to instill a winning attitude that quality players would want to be part of. It should be more of a family and less an amalgamation of mercenaries. And the city should be part of that equation (think Green Bay Packers).

    Liked by 7 people

  14. I’ve been saying for decades that Detroit being Detroit is a handicap to attracting talented, young athletes in any sport. And I’m a Motown booster. If you are single, well known, and in your 20s with multi-million dollar income would you want to prowl Detroit or NYC, Chicago, LA, SF, SD, Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, even Houston or Seattle?

    Like

  15. Up to now I really don’t think AA’s strategy has changed. Every off season AA gets a budget to spend but has too many holes to fill. Rather than spend it all on a mid tier or higher free agent, AA spends it on multiple lower level free agents to try to fill the holes. Tigers having to be very aggressive to get RG speaks volumes that he is likely our “major” off season acquisition.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Two points. 1: How does the Tigers offering tenders to all the players this offseason fit in with the cheap-o label given when CI / Aliva could have just let them go? 2: Downtown Detroit before C-19 was a great place with bars, restaurants, clubs, theaters, casinos, opera. Bad reputation that doesn’t fit actuality and and Windsor is just across the bridge.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I believe that visiting teams stay out in Dearborn, relatively close to Metro when the play at Comerica. So you have a hotel with nothing within walking distance and then a bus ride down I 94, with nothing to see but the Uniroyal Tire. If they stayed downtown, or perhaps in Birmingham, opposing ballplayers might not regard Detroit as Siberia.

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Build it and they will come. Sometime (I hope within two years) the young pitchers will ripen, Spencer Torkelson will be a star player and then CI needs to sign a star to get things accelerate. Keep working and modernizing player development because this is not the destination of choice. But when a club starts to turn the corner, they will consider coming.

    Liked by 4 people

  18. Although CI certainly bears responsibility for the flaws and lack a strategy, perhaps AA bears more for this mess pre-pandemic. AA stated he was under no mandate to dump payroll or curtail FA spending. At that time I assumed that he was copying the Astros model for rebuilding via the draft. Houston got it right while the Bengals continue to struggle due to poor drafting and lack of player development.

    Liked by 1 person

    • If what you say about being under no mandate, then I have to ask why AA still has a job? If an owner wants to win, he would never keep AA with the job he has done. It sounds like AA is providing Chris Illitch with cover.

      Liked by 3 people

  19. Great blog today! One other factor that has seemingly been brushed aside since COVID is whether Ilitch is planning to keep the Tigers franchise or sell it. Either way, I think containing spending is wise given all of the factors even though as a fan I would rather have a much higher payroll and the excitement that comes with splashy signings.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. The speculation that drives the off season chatter can make you feel like you are drowning. Now comes the questions over what kind of a season we will have followed by the drivel we will have to put up with in Detroit media when spring training arrives. A CBA work stoppage to follow would be ruinous for this game and that puts us all in a bad place.

    Liked by 3 people

Comments are closed.