THE DROUGHT MUST END

Holly Bio PicBy:  Holly Horning

For the first time in 43 years, someone who actually played for the Tigers was voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Cue the fanfare. Drop the balloons. Throw the confetti.

The only problem is that he, Ivan Rodriguez, will be wearing a “T” instead of a “D” on his hat when he is enshrined in Cooperstown. And for many fans, this is a bittersweet moment with feelings of happiness commingling with frustration.

But let’s look on the bright side. It’s been only 25 years since a full-fledged Tiger was voted in, but belatedly, by special committee.

You got a problem with that? I do.

For one of baseball’s oldest organizations, the Tigers have one of the lowest totals of Hall of Fame members wearing the Old English D. Nine players. Count ‘em. It amounts to one player getting inducted every 14 years.

And who knew that Al Kaline would be the last player to enter on a regular ballot for many decades? Especially when the Tigers put together what is considered one of baseball’s 10 best lineups back in 1984. Remind me just how many of these guys got in?

And with the Hall of Fame snub, combined with the infamous MVP one, Alan Trammell is probably hoping the third time is the charm.

So why is this happening? Do other teams just have better stars? Is it just a NY media bias thing?

For the most part, this is a self-inflicted injury perpetuated by the Tigers’ organization upon themselves. Decades of being quiet, leaving it up to other people to make the necessary moves and being stingy with the words and recognition. This was expected behavior back in the 1970’s.

Maybe it’s time for the Tigers to enter the 21st Century and step up to what savvy organizations are now doing – even if they are already a decade and a half+ behind.

A significant number of MLB teams have their own Hall of Fame. The Tigers don’t. And when it comes time to consider Hall of Fame candidates, most teams present binders and videos of their players on the ballot to the voters. The Tigers don’t. Many high-ranking executives make a push for their former players in the media. The Tigers don’t. And the majority of teams retire players numbers without waiting for them to enter the Hall, if at all. The Tigers don’t.

Sense a pattern here?

Over the past month, the Texas Rangers’ President was making the rounds during Hall of Fame voting to push for Pudge. And on his last day playing in Boston, the Red Sox retired David Ortiz’ number.

Just why the heck are the Tigers waiting? Why do they continue to sit on their hands and do nothing – and then wonder (silently, of course) why their players don’t get the recognition they deserve? Don’t they see that this is one of the biggest hot buttons for their fans?

When you aren’t vocal about players’ records or historical relevance, how important they are to the organization or offer any kind of official recognition within your own organization, don’t be surprised when others also gloss over your candidates in lieu of others. Especially when the majority of the voters now aren’t old enough to remember seeing your guy play. If you don’t think enough about your guys to go to bat for them, why should anyone else think they are special and deserving?

And as a branding consultant, I gnash my teeth when I see this. (I also swear but our blog rules prevent me from including them.) Not keeping up with modern times renders you obsolete fast. You fall behind. You become less relevant. And your value falls. Not branding your organization plays havoc with your finances, clients, reputation and sustainability.  This is especially important when all teams inevitably take that turn from consistent winning to troubled, rebuilding years.

What I can’t understand is the business end of it. Branding your organization increases your perceived and actual value significantly. It’s one of the best ways to draw new clients (or fans) and increase your bottom line. I simply can’t fathom why an organization refuses to adequately brand themselves so they may increase revenue.  For over a decade, the Tigers have consistently had payroll exceed revenue.  You’d think they would want to resolve that issue.

I believe we can safely add this lax attitude about branding and refusal to support former players to our list of greatest Tigers mysteries.

How many more fans would come to the ballpark so they could visit the Detroit Tigers Hall of Fame? Maybe even pay an extra admission? To visit the promenade near the outfield to touch the conjoined statues of Tram and Lou turning two?

So much potential. So little attempted. And too few Tigers in the Hall as a result.

22 thoughts on “THE DROUGHT MUST END

  1. Holly is it true recent article stated Rodriguez did steroids?If so then he should be in steroids hall of fame with the others.Yes his stats as a catcher were very good.

    Like

    • Hi, Nolan – There are multiple examples that supports Pudge doing steriods, but no official evidence. However, many did PEDs without testing positive – but were caught via other methods, such as Lance Armstrong, Marion Jones and ARod and those from the Balco scandal. Thanks for the question – and for reading! – Holly

      Like

  2. A tale about…draw new fans. Before 2006, when wearing here in Italy my Tiger gear, people would ask what was that Japonese letter on it. Now everyone knows and say: Oh Verlander, Cabrera! Visiting Florence last year with a Tiger hat, a guy came up to me: Hi Sir, what about our Tigers this year? Enough said.

    Like

  3. Given that overall attendance is down 423,350 since the 2014 season, one would think having an official retirement ceremony for 1,3 and 47 (on separate dates) would boost attendance a little and generate a couple of sellouts while recouping some of the millions lost due to declining attendance. Holly, I need an Open Mike, please!

    Like

  4. It appears that we will have to wait for new ownership to address the team’s lack of effort to promote our players. Funny that Mr. Illitch hasn’t recognized that a little self promotion could have enhanced the value of his club.

    Like

  5. At the end of your blog you mention the potential revenue a Hall of Fame could generate. I’ve thought the same. Keep it open all season. Build a “Hall of Fame” wing in a “Tigers’ History Museum”, that honored all past teams. Kind of a “50 Years with the Tigers” approach.

    Like

  6. Different sports but it’s interesting how quickly the Ilitch Family honored Steve Yzerman by retiring his number on Jan. 2, 2007 two years BEFORE he was inducted into the NHL HOF. Why is it so different for 1,3,47?! I don’t get it….

    Like

  7. Well said Holly, especially about the additional revenue, but even in NY, they don’t charge admission for their HOF!

    Like

  8. You piqued my curiosity with your comment about the last Tiger voted into the HOF. I’m admittedly not real savvy on accessing such information so I was wishing you would’ve named the player. The last one I came up with is Jim Bunning in 1996. Is that who you were meaning? Thanks!

    Like

    • Hi, Randall – Unfortunately, Jim Bunning did not go into the Hall as a Tiger even though the team was his primary one. He went in as a Philly – and that’s a whole ‘nother story. 🙂 The last Tiger to go in was Hal Newhouser by special committee in 1992. Before that, George Kell, also by special committee, in 1983. Thanks for the question – and for reading! – Holly

      Like

      • Someone asked Bunning why he went in as a Phillie when his best years were with the Tigers. He replied that after the phone call telling him he’d been traded to Philly, the next time the Tigers officially contacted him was after he was elected to the Hall and that was mostly to confirm that of course he’d go in as a Tiger.

        Like

  9. Why can’t one of the intrepid Detroit sports writers go to the Tiger Brass and ask them why there is no HOF and why they do not seem to promote the great Tigers players? There has to be answers, why hasn’t anybody tried to find them?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, Sprocket – I’m here on orders from Helen. 🙂 I don’t think the question gets asked because reporters understand the damage that can be done by asking the hard questions. Esp. today as the print media reduces in force on a daily basis. We’ve seen probably the best local writer ask some tough questions and then disappear from the beat. I think it will take a national writer to get some information. Great questions – thanks! – Holly

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Wish there was a way to promote you for consideration as the Tigers branding consultant Holly. Great post! Would love to hear your response to Sprocket’s question. It’s an excellent one.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. I don’t doubt the validity of what you say. But if professional journalists can only evaluate the legacies of players of the caliber of Whitaker and Trammel based on PR campaigns, the profession is in an utterly appalling state.

    Like

    • Hi, Max – There’s a huge difference between a PR campaign and a strategy that presents statistics and video of the player’s athletic prowess. As we know, many of the journalists who vote don’t do the homework and take a cursory look at their stats without putting them into context. What teams do is to offer the pertinent information in a format that encourages these voters to take an extended look so they hopefully make informed choices. And from what we’ve seen esp. within the past couple years, more and more of that body of voters has come under harsh scrutiny and esp. from athletes already enshrined. Thanks for continuing the dialog! – Holly

      Liked by 1 person

  12. It has always puzzeld me why they built the wings the way we all wish. Good farm only the occasional free agent and so on. Results were what was expected,. Championship s. They took a different path with the tigers. Wings players get hof and retired numbers and so on. Why the difference?

    Like

    • I think you answered your own question– Championships! And many of the stars the Red Wings acquired during their run already had HOF credentials when they got here.

      Like

  13. It’s good to know that the journalists who hide behind their votes with anonymity will no longer be able to after 2017 (or ’18). There has never been a player to be named on ALL of the ballots – not Ruth, Gehrig, or even Cobb! “Peer pressure” may be just the thing needed for voters to put down the names of deserving candidates and leave their biases for NY, STL, or their hometown behind.

    Like

  14. Just thought of this, but why isn’t George Kell’s number retired? According to baseballreference.com, Kell wore the numbers 21, 15, and 7 – the latter being his last and for the period 1951-52. And what number did Pudge wear? Oh no – I hope that Ilitch does not retire Pudge’s number and then drag George back in as being “co-honored”!

    Like

  15. The 2 most recently qualified–Tram and Lou–were fairly colorless players and except for Tram in 1987, neither had any really big, splashy years. They were both just very, very good for an awfully long time. And Tram came up when the idea of shortstop was changing. Tram’s WAR is 1 less than Jeter with Lou’s several games more than either.

    Like

Comments are closed.